Peer Review Process
Reviewer Responsibilities
Reviewers play a vital role in maintaining the quality, integrity, and credibility of the peer-review process. By accepting a review invitation, reviewers agree to:
Provide Objective Reviews: Evaluate manuscripts fairly, impartially, and constructively based on scientific merit.
Maintain Confidentiality: Treat all submitted manuscripts and related information as confidential documents.
Declare Conflicts of Interest: Inform the editorial office of any personal, professional, or financial conflicts that could influence the review.
Deliver Timely Reviews: Complete the review within the assigned deadline or promptly notify the editor if additional time is required.
Offer Constructive Feedback: Provide clear, respectful, and evidence-based comments that help authors improve their work.
Assess Ethical Compliance: Report suspected plagiarism, duplicate publication, fabricated data, unethical research practices, or other ethical concerns.
Evaluate Research Quality: Consider originality, methodology, data analysis, interpretation of results, relevance, and contribution to the field.
Support Editorial Decisions: Submit recommendations with appropriate justification while recognizing that the final publication decision rests with the Editor.
Avoid Use of Unpublished Information: Do not use or share any unpublished data or ideas obtained through the review process for personal advantage.
Uphold Publication Ethics: Follow internationally accepted standards of peer review and publication ethics throughout the review process.
LGJSS appreciates the valuable contributions of reviewers in ensuring the publication of high-quality, ethical, and impactful scholarly research.
