Peer Review Process
Double-Blind Review Chart
The following flowchart illustrates the complete double-blind peer review process followed by the Indo Global Journal of Applied Management Science (IGJAMS) from manuscript submission through to online publication and indexing.
Double-Blind Principle
The identities of both the authors and reviewers remain anonymous throughout the review process to ensure impartiality, fairness, and academic integrity.
Phase 1 — Initial Screening
Manuscript Submission
Author submits the manuscript through the online submission system.
Initial Editorial Screening
Editorial Office checks for suitability, scope, format, and compliance with author guidelines.
Plagiarism & Scope Check
Manuscript is screened for originality and evaluated for relevance to the journal's scope.
Desk Rejection
Manuscript is not suitable for the journal.
Phase 2 — Peer Review
Assignment to Handling Editor
The manuscript is assigned to an editor with expertise in the relevant subject area.
Double-Blind Peer Review
Editor invites minimum two independent experts. Identities of authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other.
Reviewer Recommendations
Reviewers evaluate the manuscript and submit their confidential reports and recommendations.
Editorial Decision
Editor evaluates the reports and makes a decision based on recommendations and journal policies.
Phase 3 — Acceptance & Publication
Author Revision & Resubmission
Author revises the manuscript and resubmits along with a response to reviewers.
Final Editorial Assessment
Editor verifies the revisions and may send back to reviewers if required. Final decision is made.
Acceptance for Publication
Manuscript is formally accepted for publication.
Copyediting & Typesetting
Manuscript is copyedited, formatted, and proofs are prepared.
Online Publication & Indexing
Article is published online and made available to indexing and abstracting services.