Peer Review Process
Reviewer Confidentiality Policy
IGJAMS is committed to maintaining the confidentiality and integrity of the peer-review process. Reviewers are entrusted with privileged information and are expected to handle all manuscripts responsibly and ethically. The Reviewer Confidentiality Policy includes the following principles:
Strict Confidentiality
All manuscripts, supplementary files, and editorial communications must be treated as confidential and must not be shared with any third party without prior permission from the Editor.
Use for Review Purposes Only
Information obtained through peer review must be used solely for evaluating the manuscript and must not be used for personal, academic, or commercial advantage.
No Unauthorised Distribution
Reviewers must not copy, distribute, upload, or disclose any part of the manuscript or its contents before publication.
Protection of Intellectual Property
Unpublished ideas, data, methods, and findings contained in submitted manuscripts remain the intellectual property of the authors and must be respected.
Confidential Communication
Reviewer reports and editorial correspondence are confidential and should not be disclosed or discussed outside the editorial process.
Consultation with Others
If a reviewer wishes to seek assistance from a colleague or trainee, prior approval from the Editor must be obtained. Any approved collaborator must also maintain complete confidentiality.
Secure Handling of Materials
Reviewers should securely store manuscript files during the review process and permanently delete or destroy all copies after completing the review.
Blind Peer Review
Reviewers should not attempt to identify or contact authors in journals using a blinded peer-review model, and they must not reveal their identity unless the journal's review model permits it.
Reporting Breaches
Any suspected breach of confidentiality or misuse of unpublished information should be reported promptly to the Editorial Office.
Failure to comply with this policy may result in removal from the journal’s reviewer database and may lead to other appropriate actions in accordance with the journal’s publication ethics policies.
