Editorial Board

Editorial Workflow

MJMS — Metro Journal of Modern Science (ISSN 2348-5701)

Modern Thinking | Scientific Discovery | Sustainable Tomorrow

Editorial Workflow

- Online manuscript submission through the journal portal. Automatic acknowledgement sent to the corresponding author.
- - Scope verification
  - Formatting compliance
  - Plagiarism screening
  - Ethical compliance
- - Initial quality assessment
  - Suitability for peer review
  - Desk rejection if outside journal scope
- - Subject expert assigned
  - Editorial handling initiated
- - 2–3 Independent reviewers invited
  - Double-blind review process
- Reviewers evaluate:
  - Novelty
  - Scientific quality
  - Methodology
  - Results
  - References
  - Ethics
- Associate Editor reviews reviewer reports and recommends:
  - Accept
  - Minor Revision
  - Major Revision
  - Reject
- Decision letter with reviewer comments sent to the author.
- Authors revise the manuscript and submit:
  - Revised manuscript
  - Response to reviewers
- Revised manuscript evaluated by:
  - Associate Editor or
  - Original reviewers
- Editor-in-Chief makes the final publication decision.
- - Language editing
  - Formatting
  - Proof preparation
- Authors review and approve the final proof before publication.
- - DOI assigned
  - Article published online
  - Open Access
- - Metadata dissemination
  - Citation tracking
  - Long-term archiving
  - Corrections / Retractions (if required)

MJMS Publication Standards

Double-Blind Peer Review
COPE Publication Ethics
Open Access Publishing
DOI Assignment
Crossref Metadata Registration
ORCID Integration
Long-term Digital Preservation
Global Scholarly Visibility

Our Commitment

Metro Journal of Modern Science (MJMS) is dedicated to publishing high-quality, peer-reviewed research that advances scientific knowledge through ethical publishing, rigorous editorial standards, transparency, innovation, and global accessibility.

Editorial Board

Editorial Workflow

MJMS — Metro Journal of Modern Science (ISSN 2348-5701)

Modern Thinking | Scientific Discovery | Sustainable Tomorrow

Editorial Workflow

- Online manuscript submission through the journal portal. Automatic acknowledgement sent to the corresponding author.
- - Scope verification
  - Formatting compliance
  - Plagiarism screening
  - Ethical compliance
- - Initial quality assessment
  - Suitability for peer review
  - Desk rejection if outside journal scope
- - Subject expert assigned
  - Editorial handling initiated
- - 2–3 Independent reviewers invited
  - Double-blind review process
- Reviewers evaluate:
  - Novelty
  - Scientific quality
  - Methodology
  - Results
  - References
  - Ethics
- Associate Editor reviews reviewer reports and recommends:
  - Accept
  - Minor Revision
  - Major Revision
  - Reject
- Decision letter with reviewer comments sent to the author.
- Authors revise the manuscript and submit:
  - Revised manuscript
  - Response to reviewers
- Revised manuscript evaluated by:
  - Associate Editor or
  - Original reviewers
- Editor-in-Chief makes the final publication decision.
- - Language editing
  - Formatting
  - Proof preparation
- Authors review and approve the final proof before publication.
- - DOI assigned
  - Article published online
  - Open Access
- - Metadata dissemination
  - Citation tracking
  - Long-term archiving
  - Corrections / Retractions (if required)

MJMS Publication Standards

Double-Blind Peer Review
COPE Publication Ethics
Open Access Publishing
DOI Assignment
Crossref Metadata Registration
ORCID Integration
Long-term Digital Preservation
Global Scholarly Visibility

Our Commitment

Metro Journal ofModern Science

Editorial Workflow

Editorial Workflow

Metro Journal ofModern Science

Editorial Workflow

Editorial Workflow